Luke's First Attempt at Political Ramblings
When writing this post, I had created an outline of what I wanted to say, but as I wrote, I kept getting distracted and going down rabbit trails until I finally ended up with the disjointed ramblings below which are nothing like the outline I started out with. The subject is even different. I am not sure that all of it is understandable or even if I portrayed my opinions correctly. If there is something here that doesn't make sense or that just seems plain wrong, feel free to comment about it and I will tell you if what you think I am thinking is actually what I am thinking.
As we march steadily towards this coming election, it seems to be increasingly clear that our nation is sinking into socialism. What makes it worse is that nobody seems to care, in fact, the Republican Party which is supposed to be the conservative party now seems to be in a race to pick up the most liberal voters, not by showing the voters the wonders of conservatism (which the Republicans seem to have forgotten), but rather by becoming more liberal. Many seem to regard this as an advancement in our society. Of course the question then arises, “Advancing towards what?” to which the liberal's inevitable answer is, “Towards a more just society.” This then, of course, gives rise to another question: “How does liberalism increase the amount of social justice?” Generally the answer given by liberals is, “more government programs and restrictions” or to be succinct, “socialism.” The reason for why is usually something along the lines of government being the only institution powerful enough to do what is needed. I have heard this argument used for government subsidization of wind farms. The argument was that such a thing would be completely unfeasible for private enterprise and so the government must help so that the world might be saved from the corruption of coal. There seem to be several holes in this argument though.
First of all, government should not even have such power in the first place. It is a sad sorry fact of our lives that government has ceased to be the small, tidy constitutional republic that it once was and has now become a huge democratic bureaucracy. Secondly, and this is probably the reason for government growth, is the sad sorry fact that people have placed their faith in government to save them, not from the wrath of God, but from guilt and want. Quite often, it seems that the new western religion is modern humanistic pseudoscience with its ironically technicistic and yet postmodern gospel. To add to this, there seems to be no separation between this “church” and the state. Government supposedly operates by these “scientific” social principles and is therefor the almighty savior from whatever bothers you. Similar parallels can be seen in the deification of the Caesars and the old divine right of kings ideas. While it is true that our government officials are given to us by God and that we should obey their mandates in all that is right, government is not there to be either our savior or the intercessor between God and man, particularly a false god. Our faith must not be in the government or chariots and horses, but in God. (I believe the blame for this can at leased partly be placed on the American church, but that is a discussion for another time.) So how then is social justice to be metered out if not by the government. Well, first of all, I do not agree with the whole idea of social justice as many in our society view it today. Christian social justice advocates hold to the idea that since man (or human kind as they would say) is created in the image of God, he deserves to be treated as well as possible. I disagree with this statement. The sad sorry fact of the matter is that that image has been fractured and we are all of our own deserving of the worst that could happen. It is only due to the grace of God that we are not all sitting in hell right now and that some of us never will. “So Luke,” you say, “are we to just go around treating people as poorly as we can?” The obvious answer is, “No.” Why? Out of respect for the image of God is why. “But Luke, I thought you said that they don't deserve it?” The fact is that while human beings do not deserve good, we are to do good to them out of respect for God's image. It is not the receiving of the good but the doing of the good that is commanded; not the being respected, but the respecting. It is an individual responsibility and by giving it to the government, the responsibility of the people is being taken away. And as a result, so is the respect for God's image. I have many other objections to the liberal concept of social justice such as the way that government endowment of positive freedoms diminishes the negative freedoms and enslaves and the extensive biblical argument for conservative government, but that will have to wait for another time when I have more space to talk about it and about how Acts 2 is misrepresented by my communist friends. A third reason why socialism is creeping into our society is that people are becoming lazy. In the modern world, people do not want the responsibilities of doing right and it is easier if government takes care of everything. The people just want to sit back and collect their handouts. This combined with the issue of electability in candidates creates an increasingly lazy populace and an ever more controlling government.
It seems a sad fact that the American people do not want the responsibilities associated with freedom and liberty. The affects of this go way beyond government slipping into socialism. This spirit of selfishness seems to have come from a lack of education and even more so from the decline of Christian institutions in America. While our nation may have been built on Christian principles, it seems that the majority of Americans are not Christian anymore. Even in many Churches, the Gospel is not preached anymore. It has been replaced by “self help” sermons and God has been portrayed as a helpless, all loving spirit who, “loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life” instead of the omnipotent being Who created all for His own glory. This seems to be the main cause for our decline. It is something that the mere teaching of good morals and ethics will not cure. After all, if I exist for me, then why should I worry about how I treat others just so long as there are no consequence. The only way to keep our nation from slipping eventually into a lasting decline is to change the hearts and minds of the people with the light of the Gospel, something which only God can do, and which is actualized by the preaching of the Scriptures and prayer. Any other action will only delay the inevitable.
6 Comments:
"The fact is that while human beings do not deserve good, we are to do good to them out of respect for God's image. It is not the receiving of the good but the doing of the good that is commanded; not the being respected, but the respecting. It is an individual responsibility and by giving it to the government, the responsibility of the people is being taken away."
This is really quite profound, and a little startling to boot. And it's so true! Actually I agree with pretty much the whole post, and if I had more of my brain left at this time of night, I would comment further. And perhaps I still shall, at some later date.
For now, let a resounding "I agree!" and a simple "thank you for writing this" suffice.
Thank you for your comments Qtierney. Please leave more whenever you have the time.
"We're sinking into socialism and nobody seems to care." Right on. It's debatable whether most people have even noticed. They've been too well trained [in government schools, oddly enough] : 1) not to think, and 2) to trust the government & the media implicitly. We're slowly boiling frogs, and we can't even see that we're dying.
The primary reason for this is, as you noted, that our society has rejected God. Throughout history, whenever this happens, chaos ensues; and our current situation is no exception. God's way works; man's alternative aways self-destructs. Ironic. The picture of government as savior is a familiar one, but I found your take on it rather enlightening: "...people have placed their faith in government to save them, not from the wrath of God, but from guilt and want." Unfortunately, that makes sense. Of course, being the lazy, self-centered people we are, we want the easy way out. It's much more comfortable to have our problems glossed over and ignored, than to bring them out into the sunlight and have them actually done away with. The latter takes hard work; and it hurts. And we can't have that. That's no fun at all.
I think another key factor in the decline of our nation has been the almost total abandonment of logic & reason, in favor of some kind of absurdly naive "feeling". Our society is incredibly emotion-driven; and nobody is more keenly aware of this than the infallible media. We were just talking about McCain's recently selected running mate during dinner tonight. Who knows what exactly he's trying to accomplish with that bizarre choice, but people seem to love her already. I mean...she's a woman to begin with, she has five kids (though you've got to to wonder who's going to be raising those kids while she's busy being Vice President), one of her kids has downs syndrome, she's somewhat more conservative than McCain, and she's kind of pretty. Does any of that have anything to do with how she would function in office? No. Nor does it change the fact that she's running with John McCain, who is headed in exactly the same direction as Obama, only at a slightly slower pace. But nobody notices. Nobody cares.
Well, I shouldn't say nobody, though. There are people out there who are recovering the lost art of thinking, and who can see where we are and how far we've fallen. There are even those who are willing and wanting to do something about it. They may be the minority as yet, but they're growing; and with God, all things are possible. I think your ending was very fitting, very apt: "The only way to keep our nation from slipping eventually into a lasting decline is to change the hearts and minds of the people with the light of the Gospel, something which only God can do, and which is actualized by the preaching of the Scriptures and prayer. Any other action will only delay the inevitable." The world can only change, one person, one family at a time, and that only by the power of the Lord.
Ah, well, this is exceedingly long and very poorly organized, and I only touched, insufficiently, on a very few aspects of a fascinating and many-faceted topic. It seems like these things sometimes work better as actual conversations...left to myself, I tend to wander down every available bunny trail, and monologue at inordinate length on topics we probably already agree on.
P.S. It says I posted my last comment at around 8:00 p.m. For the record, it was later than that here, by several hours.
I have been using the "Boiling Frogs" metaphor to describe the American Political scene for a while now, but it is sounds scarier coming from someone who else. I agree with you on everything else you say too. With regards to Palin, I know nothing about what she believes. While it is sad that her daughter ended up pregnant like she did, I am very impressed that she is marrying the guy. Call me crazy, but I am also impressed that her husband belongs to some Alaskan Independence group (I don't know why, but I always find my self rooting for the succession guys:) That being said, does she think that her family will raise itself? Does she think that she is sacrificing them for the common good? Why isn't her husband running? There is a lot more I could say, but not in a reply. Anyway, you comment may have been poorly organized, but it was better than my post. Thanks and comment often.
I still don't know enough about Palin to give a strong opinion on her; but from what I do know, I'm still not impressed. Especially since she's running with McCain. I didn't know about her husband belonging to that group...that's interesting...but (as you say) why doesn't HE run for office, then?
Secession is sounding like one of our better options at this point. Count me in.
Bah. I keep on having thoughts, and then losing them halfway through. I think I need to go to bed. It's an interesting topic, though, to be sure, and I must look into it further at some later date.
p.s. I doubt very much that my comment was either better or better organized (whichever you meant) than your post. In fact, I know it wasn't. The end.
top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]online casinos[/url] check the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]casino[/url] manumitted no set aside hand-out at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]liberated largesse casino
[/url].
Post a Comment
<< Home